|

|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| About The Author |
Paul Beach Paul Beach was born in
Oregon and went to school in Portland. He spent the
greater chunk of his adult life on the road as a
professional musician, traveling the United States and
abroad. Paul now lives in Florida with Beverly, his soul
mate, in a house full of teenagers and animals. He still
plays music in a band.
In addition to The Real
Vampires Trilogy, Paul has also written an action novel
featuring a flying machine, The Flitbike. He likes to
research and write about immortality.
Paul is a
student of philosophy, particularly Aristotle. He enjoys
riding his tandem bicycles along the beach with Beverly,
living a totally healthy lifestyle, and thinking about
forever. | | |
 |
 | |
| What I've been telling people,
particularly the local book clubs I've been speaking to, is what I think makes my
books superior to so many other vampire stories.
You see, some recent
vampire-oriented publications feature some vampires that are upwards of
three-hundred years old. They can go out during the day, and they
can survive on the blood of animals. Now, when I ask how many people
would choose to become a vampire under those conditions all hands go
up. By contrast, my vampires will die if they go out during the day,
they can only survive on fresh human blood (no blood banks); they can't
even kill themselves very easily. When I ask groups who would choose
to take immortality under those conditions, I get significantly less hands
in the air.
So what we're dealing with is
story plausibility. An author's job is to tell a story that the
reader (or viewer) can entertain as being really possible. A good
author will be able to take a situation from reality, and introduce a
concept that is passing bizarre, (such as vampires, aliens, super-heroes,
or what have you) and work out the logistics so that the story is
plausible.
With that said, here is the
implausibility of having three-hundred year old vampires that can go out
during the day and survive on the blood of animals. Picture yourself
as a brand new vampire in 1709. You got some cool powers, you
regenerate, you don't age and members of the opposite sex dig you!
You can still go out during the day and nobody has to die to keep you
alive. Very little downsides right? The only downside, maybe,
is that you're going to outlive all of your loved-ones right? Wrong! You are going to turn them all into vampires because there is no downside
to being one. By the time 2009 rolls around, EVERYONE in the world
is a vampire. And the world would be a better place for it, quite
frankly.
Of course, that's not the world
we live in, so what I'm saying is, there can plausibly be no such thing as
a three-hundred year old vampire that can go out during the day and
survive on the blood of animals. The plausibility of those other more
happy and safe vampire stories is blown out of the water.
The world we live in has
absolutely no measurable evidence to even hint at the possibility of
vampires. So if I were to plausibly suggest that vampires might
exist, I'd have to explain why we have no evidence for them. I might
suggest that anyone that has ever encountered a vampire has not lived to
talk about it. I might say that vampires keep their numbers very
low, to keep the body-count low for their own protection, because surely
if the existence of vampires were to become common knowledge, them most
people would want them killed; we fear what we don't understand. I
might go on to suggest even further that such ancient creatures might be
running our world very discretely from behind the scenes. NOW we've
got a plausible vampire story, ya dig? -- Paul
Beach |